When will the progressive left admit that ObamaCare is just one version of “spread the wealth? Because the healthcare plan mandates coverage for all illness or healthcare from first dollar, rather than only spending money for the indigent and extremely sick. Worse, the mandate enforces taxes, rather than allowing charity or compassionate care.
Slate.com has a blog post concerning ObamaCare written by Jacob Weisberg, entitled “Let him die.” The author flatly implies that one or more of the Republican Presidential candidates would let a patient die if he can not pay for needed care.
Forget that none of the candidates said any such thing. One man in the audience at Monday night’s debate for Republican Candidates in Orlando shouted “yeah!” when one of the moderators asked Ron Paul the question. There’s dispute about whether the shout came before or after Congressman Paul answered, “No.”
This incident is being cited as “playing the death card” by another blogger, at the University of Chicago School of Law’s Richard Epstein, who is not satisfied with calling Republicans names. He suggests that rationing is reasonable:
One telling illustration about this example is that Weisberg does not tell us whether the individual who receives this care lives or dies when the treatment is over. If we assume the latter, the initial question is whether intensive care at, say, $10,000 to $20,000 per day represents the best use of social resources. A bit of simple arithmetic says that society has spent $1.83 million to $3.66 million on a venture that may well have kept this person alive in a comatose state or have subjected him to repeated invasive treatments when hospice care may well have been preferable.
(Try not to think about “death panels.”)
Hat tip to Texas Medical Association and Drs.