You're reading...
Bioethics, Life Issues, LifeEthics, Medicine, Philosophy, Pro-life, Utilitarianism

Lest we forget — “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” Journal of Medical Ethics

#Gosnell would be vindicated if these “ethicists” have their way

There are two reasons which, taken together, justify this claim:

The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus, that is, neither can be considered a ‘person’ in a morally relevant sense.

It is not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense.

via After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? — Giubilini and Minerva — Journal of Medical Ethics.

About bnuckols

Conservative Christian Family Doctor, promoting conservative news and views. (Hot Air under the right wing!)

Discussion

2 thoughts on “Lest we forget — “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” Journal of Medical Ethics

  1. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and
    wanted to mention that I’ve really loved browsing your weblog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!

    Posted by https://WilliamstvLE8zWh.jux.com | April 9, 2014, 9:32 PM
  2. Greetings I am so thrilled I found your blog, I really found you by mistake, while I was researching on Askjeeve
    for something else, Anyways I am here now
    and would just like to say kudos for a incredible post and a
    all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to read through it all at the minute but
    I have saved it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the fantastic job.

    Posted by bestsoftblog.com | May 31, 2014, 3:29 PM

Click here to get your “Choose Life” license plate

Rick Perry RickPAC

Yes, I'm still for Governor Perry!

RickPAC

What to read around here

Archives

SiteMeter

%d bloggers like this: